Women still earn 85 cents - why? According to reports, the woman has to work 418 calendar days (22.

Women still earn 85 cents - why? According to reports, the woman has to work 418 calendar days (22.2.saakka) to earn as much as a man of euros a year. Typically, a woman makes, but also most of the housework mortgages and single parent will make them their own. Women we go on strike? Addendum: Is there ways to make women's 85 euro cents euro? I think one of the most effective ways of parenting would be the cost of the replacement business. As for employers, job seekers mortgages know that the women's mortgages maternity leave periods there are costs to the employer. Job seekers this is psykologisemotionaalisia effects, including salary requirements statements. While employers know that thing should not affect the choice of the employee, mortgages it has an undeniable impact even today. Costs of parenthood could be replaced by national companies with public funds, and in some cases even different EU funds. This would remove one obstacle to equal pay for the road. Much has been done in the direction of the labor market organizations. Collective bargaining often lead to discrimination against women, in particular wages, working conditions, employment and vocational training. The problem may not be as high in Finland than in many other EU member states. The single most important way is, of course, wage increases in female-dominated fields. I think that, for example, teachers' mortgages salaries are too low, as well as the nursing staff. This Finnish man can not make a manly occupations women held their fire men (37.1%). Construction worker (13.3%) and the police (11.6%) so crushingly defeated politician (0.3%) as a bank manager in (1.1%).
This is nothing but a huge editysaskel: we are already 85 cents. But let's not even that fit. Seriously, these lies are not true repeats the change. How to tell adults they care to people with stories just with a straight face? 12.01.09 14:31
It's mortgages great that would be propaganda Presenting Those people are already noyryytettyyn to such a state. Thus, the threshold is exceeded - collectively - think this has taken place in the last couple of years. Tuossahan is a good example of the Social Democratic Party in ruins - who the hell normaalijarkinen mortgages out of this crowd would vote for? 12.01.09 15:04
yes, of course women find firefighters manly than a politician or a bank director ...... but still prefer to marry a bank manager or a politician. Somewhat surprisingly, the difference between women's heard here in the comments, that survey found that women are not men pidäkkään make-over. Other issues that women will not accept the man, were snus use, smoking, and the collar chock-full of chest hair. The last of those in contact with the most compatible with ours ...: (... even now, after all, is not just "collar gush" ... :) 12/01/09 15:19
"But there are things that women can not accept the man, whether snus use, smoking, and the collar chock-full of chest hair." Do not miss out go, if it comes to hockey star, a rock musician, or some Mediterranean rantaleijonasta. Rockdiivalle may be allowed up to mekit, as long as the use of their own. 12.01.09 15:58
Will Green of the same kind of political suicide as the Social Democratic Party was choosing Jutta charge?: The Greens shortage of the candidates ... the parliamentary group chairman Anni's where the hill has already been taken for granted candidate. Gay 12/01/09 17:35
My alaisistani women are mostly lower remuneration. Antakaapa me tell you why: they do not ask for more than that. Should I have any pity factor of salary for people who are not afraid to ask for more? Men ask for more järjestään, watches that do not remain after the market averages. I have a budget to be watched, so why on earth I would suggest to any of the better paid, if it is not requested. Sometimes, though, I've done that too, but when the reaction is 'I do not think it is to earn a', then yes it will itellekin feeling that "maybe you do not then." Pay is the same rule applies as in all other areas of life: who requests mortgages it receives. 12.01.09 18:49
"While employers know that thing should not affect the choice of the employee, it has an undeniable impact even today." mortgages What is this claim? If it is so undeniable, so the screen has to be really strong, nothing mutuilua. Taxpayers, who have no children, are already paying a considerable sum of money, which the children are grown and trained. We may well ask, is why family mortgages to be more support with families? I'm not really sure if the person who sees the kids just a cost center and a burden in his career (as many of these complaints, judging will do), in general, a suitable parent. Can not have everything: if you acquire a child, it is an enjoyable life situation and be able to withstand the stresses associated with it. Not all of the child or the family will never get, even if they wanted. Now, they should still be flexible then other family + career projects forward. Does not sound like a fair. "Collective