As part of our website, we use cookies to provide you with services at the highest level, including

Article polemic - Deregulation and reimbursement for license protection is not the police - Controversy Controversy Article Article - Disabled worker protection - is it over? What can bodyguard (wp.pl) Cookies
Select a page Home About Portal - Gregory Krzeminski News - From the Land - The World - Other industries Polls - Earnings Protection Law Forum Columns Polemics - Controversy for the article - Deregulation and reimbursement for license - it's not police protection - polemic to the article - Article polemic - Disabled worker protection - is it over? - What can bodyguard (wp.pl) Cookies
Since they do not cease dyskus ...
Tagged under: protection plan, conservation plan or manual protection, the differences loan between mandatory and optional objects of protection Gregory Krzeminski http://ochrona.pro/o-portalu/grzegorz-krzeminski
Argument for the fact that the plan is the only document loan functioning under the Act introduced in the previous article. In a nutshell - Speaking of that eligible employee has the right to develop a security plan to the extent specified in Article 3, point 1, I guess there is not much possibility of inventing loan additional documents. This provision explicitly states that the document which describes the physical protection of persons and property (art. 3 point 1) is simply a plan to protect and nothing more.
At the same time, it is critical that neither the art. Paragraph 26. 2, or in art. 3 points. 1 does not claim that the plans are valid for ONLY OBJECTS OF MINIMUM PROTECTION. It means so much in my opinion that those restrictive use protection plan only to the objects set out in section 2 of the Act on the Protection of persons and property, unauthorized use interpretation of a rule of law (narrowing of the application). Analogy
The Labour Code defines in Art. 104 required to establish the working rules. But the threshold to employ at least 20 people. I've seen quite a few companies that have implemented the rules work for 10 people. Nobody thought about manual labor, or working loan procedure. Terms simply organize the work, regardless of the number of people.
The problem on the basis of the leading document (root) in the protection arises in connection with the organization of the protection of objects subject loan to mandatory protection. And in terms of the plan itself, significant differences are apparent. Below I will try to write as they look Requirements: Objects optional protection
Plan for the protection of objects, areas and equipment subject to mandatory protection are agreed "on the basis of" Methodology loan issued loan by the Chief of Police. This is an internal regulation of the Police and does not constitute legal requirements, but with practice, loan I have not seen the plan, which would have been agreed upon not meeting the requirements contained in this document.
As you can see there are a lot of differences. Conservation plan for the objects to be protected can not have any structure, form and content. It is important to organize physical security to the extent specified in Art. 3 points. 1. Despite the lack of requirements for the structure - always loan recommend that, if held to the guidelines contained in Art. 7 and Methodology, bypassing the chapters on SUFO.
deregulation bodyguard france handlówka Business School impel manual intervention to protect the convoy escorts Konsalnet qualified employee theft theft protection airport commercial buildings ochrona.pro protection of personal data protection personal protection physical protection of persons and property protection bodyguard bodyguards personal protection plan Polish police beating portal portal conservation work to protect the security staff worker protection regulation Sochi russia solid shooting loan setae hospital recognition agreement junk boat bombing Warsaw
World Sec Info LTD 590 Kingston Road, London SW20 8DN United Kingdom Company Number 08461140 Email: admin (at) worldsecinfo.com Contact (for Angielski) gk@worldsecinfo.co.uk Contact loan (Polish) gk@worldsecinfo.com
Statistics: 48 This entry: 125 885 Hits total: 41 Hits today: 180 Hits yesterday: 83,650 guests together: 36 guests today: 3 guests are currently online: 15.12.2013 From: Home | cookies policy | RSS | About the publisher site | Contact us | Partner sites: Ochronaplus.pl Security Safe Plus Smartphone
As part of our website, we use cookies to provide you with services at the highest level, including in a manner tailored to individual loan needs. loan Using the site without changing loan the settings for cookies is that they will be posted in your terminal. You can at any time make changes to the settings for cookies. More details in our Accept "Cookies Policy."